From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 12 12:26:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA08482 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 12:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA08471 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 12:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from narvi@localhost) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.6.12/8.6.12) id WAA11699; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 22:12:45 +0300 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 22:12:45 +0300 (EET DST) From: Narvi To: Jaye Mathisen cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD/OS webperf notes, anybody want to test FreeBSD? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 12 Aug 1996, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > > http://www.BSDI.COM:81/products/internet-server/benchmarks/webperf.html > > > > I would think we could do better. Sure. But we should not compare ourselves with BSDI, but with Microsoft, I think. It would be quite good. There is another way in which we could perhaps do the test - what would the benefit be in the difference in the cost of hardware to serve as well as Microsoft does. A motherboard with a meg of ram is a beast in itself... Sander > >