From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 16:46:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98049106566B for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5191E8FC08 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SLzvo-0006RD-58 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:46:36 +0200 Received: from www01.lwilke.de ([78.47.159.91]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:46:36 +0200 Received: from lw by www01.lwilke.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:46:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Lars Wilke Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:46:01 +0000 Lines: 17 Message-ID: <97pd69-nfr.ln1@lwilke.de> References: <8ol369-4nf.ln1@lwilke.de> <20120419114418.GE15520@cklennard.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: www01.lwilke.de User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (Linux) Subject: Re: Watchdog timeout em driver 8.2-R X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:46:39 -0000 * Lars Wilke wrote: > * Jack Vogel wrote: > > ok then i guess i will upgrade to 8.3-R, is the driver there reasonably > > new? > > > > Yes, that should be fine. Ok, with 8.3R everything seems to be stable, at least i could not reproduce the NIC resetting itself in last 4 houers now :) But i noticed that, i.e. dev.em.3.tx_dma_fail: 41316 is increasing rather quickly and my NFS write performance dropped rather badly. What does the tx_dma_fail mean? --lars