From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 12 03:31:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C85837B401 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 03:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thuis.piwebs.com (217-19-20-186.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.20.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C97643FD7 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 03:31:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from avleeuwen@piwebs.com) Received: (qmail 55478 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2003 10:32:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.0.109) (192.168.0.109) by 0 with SMTP; 12 Aug 2003 10:32:04 -0000 From: Arjan van Leeuwen To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:31:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308121231.00875.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Subject: Update www/opera to 7.x beta, or repo-copy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:31:05 -0000 Hi, Yesterday, Opera 7.20 Beta 3 for FreeBSD was released (the first 7.x version for FreeBSD). I'm planning on taking maintainership of the www/opera port (if no one objects, of course) and updating it. There's a bit of a dilemma here. Would it be better to get a new port, www/opera7 for this (because 7.20 B3 is still beta), or to update the existing www/opera port to 7.20 B3? I personally think the latter is a better idea, because www/opera is at this moment pretty unstable. 7.20 B3 is a lot better. Also, there is no development anymore going on in the 6.x tree at Opera, so there won't be any other updates to www/opera. What do you think? If we all agree on this, I'll send in a PR today. Best regards, Arjan