From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Thu Dec 29 15:06:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6886DC96809 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 15:06:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@cschwarz.com) Received: from orion.uberspace.de (orion.uberspace.de [95.143.172.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE68E14DF for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 15:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@cschwarz.com) Received: (qmail 24055 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2016 15:06:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO csarch.local) (127.0.0.1) by orion.uberspace.de with SMTP; 29 Dec 2016 15:06:17 -0000 Received: by csarch.local (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C3AF8417C36; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 16:06:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 16:06:12 +0100 From: Christian Schwarz To: Vincent Olivier Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap? Message-ID: <20161229150612.jzwglvn4gh57z7qx@csarch> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 15:06:32 -0000 On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 09:50:47AM -0500, Vincent Olivier wrote: > Should I create a new bridge? It depends. If you share a bridge over multiple VMs, each VM can see the traffic of all other VMs. > A new tap too? I think you need this, yes. -- Christian