From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 1 11:16:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44159106568B for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33898FC20 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NFQis-00019O-KO for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:16:46 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:16:46 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:16:46 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:16:31 +0100 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4B14E2F2.7040502@ionic.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090928) In-Reply-To: <4B14E2F2.7040502@ionic.co.uk> Sender: news Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:16:48 -0000 Michal wrote: > O. Hartmann wrote: >> I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the >> Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O >> shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the >> opposite. >> >> oh > > This all reminds me of a few releases ago MySQL performance being > terrible. I guess this is still the same? No, this has effectively been fixed in 7.0: http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/os-mysql.png http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/7.0%20Preview.pdf > We've had arguments internally > weather certain machines are FreeBSD like some existing or Linux like > other existing as Linux always out-performed by miles. We never tested > these using on OpenBSD however, so I don't know if that had the same > problem... OpenBSD has terrible time adjusting to SMP. From the above PDF, I'd expect it to behave similarily to DragonflyBSD.