From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 16:54:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9EE16A40B; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:54:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls405.t-com.hr (ls405.t-com.hr [195.29.150.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A6F13C494; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [195.29.150.237]) by ls405.t-com.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6543C1449D4; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:54:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 63121D50051; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:54:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls248.t-com.hr (ls248.t-com.hr [127.0.0.1]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 4D024D50047; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:54:24 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-Sender-Info: g5URFa92gX9K/Rg9VFA/rJ2fXJNyfDs4rYUjXEWgzRA6StkSH1j7CT0zJW9WjWDV X-Envelope-Sender: ivoras@fer.hr Received: from [10.0.0.100] (89-172-38-112.adsl.net.t-com.hr [89.172.38.112]) by ls248.t-com.hr (Qmali) with ESMTP id CE2BC5E00DC; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:54:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F03FB9.5000602@fer.hr> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:54:17 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><002801c760e2$5cb5eb50$0c00a8c0@Artem> <005b01c760e6$9a798bf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001601c760ee$f76fa300$0c00a8c0@Artem> <45EF2252.1000202@fluffles.net> <45EF253B.8030909@fer.hr> <45EF9B8F.4000201@fluffles.net> <45EFA0C6.3060905@freebsd.org> <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> In-Reply-To: <45F032B9.7090102@fluffles.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD354C44D11D9BA20C09858EE" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:54:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD354C44D11D9BA20C09858EE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fluffles wrote: > The bonnie Per Char-benchmark is often bottlenecked by the CPU since it= > requires either a lot of cpu power or a lot of memory activity; both > which puts demands on the cpu. If i see only 0.5MB in the Per > Char-benchmark, i would suspect a slow CPU. Slow is a relative term > though; C3 can be powerful enough for the task you bought it, so i don'= t > want to discredit it. I'm really puzzled by your high per-char results in bonnie++. Can you run it on a single disk? I've run it many times, both on hardware and software RAIDs and have never seen results > 1 MB/s on FreeBSD (Linux is a different matter...) --------------enigD354C44D11D9BA20C09858EE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8D++ldnAQVacBcgRAt/oAJwPeq4ygH/5IJQZz4L4a1aZhaJZ0gCfb/Bf LAlq4ZlutRED4hnDfiK72+8= =2woq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD354C44D11D9BA20C09858EE--