From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Mar 29 21: 5:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-50.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6350837B71E for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:05:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D59866B41; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:05:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:05:11 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Hal Weaver Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Slow, noisey hard drive activity Message-ID: <20010329210511.A11145@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3AC3A738.B73B0404@pinetel.com> <20010329132719.B7195@xor.obsecurity.org> <3AC3F8FB.DD01EDFE@pinetel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AC3F8FB.DD01EDFE@pinetel.com>; from hweaver@pinetel.com on Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:09:47PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:09:47PM -0800, Hal Weaver wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >=20 > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:20:56PM -0800, Hal Weaver wrote: > > > I've installed the following FreeBSD release on two different removab= le > > > hard drives used in the same laptop (IBM Thinkpad 760 ED): > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > # uname -a > Kris, I made twp identical fbsd installations: > 1. on a 1.2G hard drive where fbsd uses the entire drive. Here hard > drive access is fast and quiet. > 2. on a 5G hard drive where fbsd uses only half the drive. Other OSs > share the rest of the drive. This is the problem installation for > fbsd. The other OSs both have quiet, fast disk access on this drive. >=20 > Conclusion: softupdates status would be the same on both disks; enabled, > I think. So I don't think that this problem involves softupdates > status.=20 Insufficient data to form that conclusion. Your drives are different, so have different characteristics, and the other OSes use different disk write strategies that FreeBSD as already explained. I might be wrong, but you need to test it to rule out my hypothesis ;-) Kris --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6xBQHWry0BWjoQKURAsNGAKDOYvOZXSQ2BeGW37HqQBHFPg2tpgCgqHrF M4DOkzS3Q0raSULEpwKFazI= =wta7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message