From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 00:32:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4900E1065679 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7308FC22 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2008 19:32:58 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id PIH38514; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:32:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2008 19:32:57 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18762.60345.260840.699344@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:32:57 -0500 To: "Glen Barber" In-Reply-To: <4ad871310812181611j51800f4er1ec825d7422c41a2@mail.gmail.com> References: <494ABFDF.1020408@studsvik.com> <4ad871310812181346i2539ca78x2cd581f09dfa073d@mail.gmail.com> <20081219000729.GA5950@kokopelli.hydra> <4ad871310812181611j51800f4er1ec825d7422c41a2@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suitability question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:32:59 -0000 Glen Barber writes: > >> Word processing won't be a problem, but internet 'toys' like Flash > >> will be a problem, unless you use some wine+firefox workaround. > > > > What -- nspluginwrapper doesn't work any longer? > > From personal experience, nspluginwrapper is a memory hog, and > only supports Flash 7 (last I used it). Flash 9 + nsplugginwrapper works on -CURRENT starting about a month (I think) ago. Whether the necessary changes will appear in 7.1 I do not know. Robert Huff