From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 24 19:15:21 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4714B6;
 Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F379219D2;
 Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:15:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::c59:a48:7e6d:e3d1] (unknown
 [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:c59:a48:7e6d:e3d1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB7815C43;
 Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:15:19 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: Are ports supposed to build and run on 10-CURRENT?
From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130624202326.2a6111a6@bsd64.grem.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:15:27 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <FA7BE6E8-7A53-47BB-A64F-55BC7346AB78@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20130613031535.4087d7f9@bsd64.grem.de>
 <EF830CD7-00F1-4628-8515-76133BBE85E7@FreeBSD.org>
 <C1CC40FC-4489-4164-96B7-5E1A25DCB37F@FreeBSD.org>
 <51C888C2.2040706@FreeBSD.org> <20130624202326.2a6111a6@bsd64.grem.de>
To: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>,
 Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:15:21 -0000

On Jun 24, 2013, at 20:23, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:58:26 +0200
> Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>> Am 22.06.2013 00:27, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
>> 
>>> Attached is a diff to fix the db5 port, so it correctly builds with
>>> CXXFLAGS?=-std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++.  Matthias, could you please
>>> have a look at it?
>> 
>> Does databases/db6 as a requisite make your failing port compile
>> properly?
> 
> The port failing to build using c++11 is databases/db5 itself. The port
> depending on db5 that raised the question is devel/ice, which might
> build with db6, but upstream only developed and tested it using
> db5, so sticking to that version is preferred.


Indeed, I should probably have sent this a separate mail, sorry.  The
diff was just to get db5 building with libc++.  A similar diff is needed
for db6, but before I start producing it, I would like to know if there
is any interest. :-)

Note the fixes are mostly trivial, just a renaming of a few identifiers.
If you would rather have me take it upstream, please let me know.

-Dimitry