From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 18 02:35:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB4216A41C for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 02:35:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD5F43D45 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 02:35:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6I2Z9Mj018668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:35:09 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id j6I2Z7G2062053; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:35:07 +0700 (ICT) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:35:07 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200507180235.j6I2Z7G2062053@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: chad@shire.net In-reply-to: <97D612F1-D9D2-47CD-BC93-449DFBD30EE5@shire.net> (chad@shire.net) References: <42D412D2.1000502@calarts.edu> <72cf361e050716094211c60386@mail.gmail.com> <200507170010.j6H0A1eQ053031@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <97D612F1-D9D2-47CD-BC93-449DFBD30EE5@shire.net> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam Assassin Reject X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 02:35:17 -0000 > It is possible to reject during the connection during the DATA > phase. Using exim and sa-exim glue, with spamassassin, this is what > I do. The sender gets a 5xx rejection with the message: UCE not OK it is possible, but what I meant was it is highly not advisable. You never know what the end of the message will give to. The message can look like spam at the begining and end-up being non-spam. Olivier