Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:09:45 -0700 From: listmail@websage.ca To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: libspf2-1.0.4_1 Message-ID: <20090423070945.50ba5963@niven.sohotech.ca> In-Reply-To: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAAJ6ivcALE9Ju5NmHtoCp1rCgAAAEAAAAArTgf%2BUM35Nv25/FTlES8sBAAAAAA==@dashofer.cz> References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAAJ6ivcALE9Ju5NmHtoCp1rCgAAAEAAAAArTgf%2BUM35Nv25/FTlES8sBAAAAAA==@dashofer.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:44:31 +0200 Pavel Hlub=C3=ADk <hlubik@dashofer.cz> wrote: > Hi , >=20 > sorry for disturbing you.=20 >=20 > The port is still broken so I can't install the `postfix-policyd-spf` > because it depends on the libspf2-10.=20 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> libspf2-1.0.4_1 has known vulnerabilities: > =3D> libspf2 -- Buffer overflow. > Reference: > <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/2ddbfd29-a455-11dd-a55e-00163e000= 016 > .html> >=20 > I want to use a ports system because it is easier using a > `portupgade` to upgrade the application in the future. > Can you write me when the problem can be solved. Thank you very much. >=20 > I run FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p4. >=20 > Best Regards >=20 > Pavel Hlub=C3=ADk >=20 >=20 Pavel, Try postfix-policyd-spf-perl-2.007 port instead. It appears to do the same thing using perl instead of c but seems better maintained. HTH, GM
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090423070945.50ba5963>