From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Dec 17 17:29:17 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA04189
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 17:29:17 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca34-53.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.181])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA04178
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 17:29:09 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id RAA05843; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 17:28:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 17:28:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199712180128.RAA05843@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
CC: mike@smith.net.au, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <XFMail.971217150329.sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> (message from Steve Kargl on Wed, 17 Dec 1997 14:48:12 -0800 (PST))
Subject: Re: why is tcl in base distribution
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Ah yes, the mythical sys-admin tools.  If FreeBSD was a product of
 * a local company here in Seattle, we would be screaming about vaporware.

Well, the decision has already been made by David Greenman so there is
no need to restart the discussion.  If the tools arrive, tcl will
stay; otherwise, it will be removed prior to the 3.0 release.

That is the decision everyone agreed to abide by.

Satoshi