Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 07:07:38 -0800 From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does pkg insist on replacing "normal" ports with -nox11 ones? Message-ID: <Z2rOOoGAlAGpK3OT@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <CALH631mW2a0MWHg_zy4gtvLkNyOVimeG954urb4XpvUfunuBdA@mail.gmail.com> References: <Z2rJVo7X709i1r5T@albert.catwhisker.org> <CALH631mW2a0MWHg_zy4gtvLkNyOVimeG954urb4XpvUfunuBdA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--66A++uHBkPk/gaw3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 5:47=E2=80=AFPM David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker= =2Eorg> wrote: > > > > I don't get it. Why would pkg want to be installing "-nox11" > > versions of things? >=20 > Why not? You specified a port origin rather than a package name for > some reason. This origin gives rise to several packages and pkg > chooses one of them. If you want a specific variant (without -nox11) > then spell it in the install command. Huh. OK; thanks for that. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." -- George Orwell See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --66A++uHBkPk/gaw3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iNUEARYKAH0WIQSTLzOSbomIK53fjFliipiWhXYx5QUCZ2rOOl8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0OTMy RjMzOTI2RTg5ODgyQjlEREY4QzU5NjI4QTk4OTY4NTc2MzFFNQAKCRBiipiWhXYx 5UMbAQDjgubQ3a6s/OtYjU5s+F6sRWboORjxWtuGkrKhZeUXCAEAwH0hWn4jgIyM W9wwwKwItjpHcEEhTDuqsYR4BtmETgQ= =glak -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --66A++uHBkPk/gaw3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Z2rOOoGAlAGpK3OT>