From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  1 18:06:26 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CFC6737B401; Thu,  1 May 2003 18:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 77E9B43F93; Thu,  1 May 2003 18:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h4216OA7012606;
	Thu, 1 May 2003 19:06:24 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 19:06:12 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030501.190612.124380423.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: marcel@xcllnt.net
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030501193258.GB778@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net>
References: <200304291911.h3TJB0E2076851@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<XFMail.20030501143516.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
	<20030501193258.GB778@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: njl@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica acconfig.h acenv.h
 acfreebsd.h acgcc.h acpi.h acpiosxf.h acpixf.h acutils.h dbcmds.c
 dbxface.c exfldio.c exsystem.c hwsleep.c psparse.c rscreate.c tbget.c
 utglobal.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 01:06:27 -0000

In message: <20030501193258.GB778@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net>
            Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> writes:
: The question: do people think we should try to get another ACPI
: snapshot in (provided we have someone willing to do it) and thus
: try to get it fixed the "official" way or are we ok with changing
: contrib'd code in this case and revert to the vendor branch when
: we do upgrade sometime after 5.1?

We must have another snapshot with all the breakages that this import
caused fixed.  If Nate isn't willing to do it, I would be.  In the
long term it is in our best interest to get the issues resolved with
the Intel code.

Warner