From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 17 22:10:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE86EBC for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 22:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEA752835 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 22:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAHMA1qi015653 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 22:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rAHMA1d7015650; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 22:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 22:10:01 GMT Message-Id: <201311172210.rAHMA1d7015650@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: docs/182833: [porters-handbook]: document QMake usage, update Qt section X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eitan Adler List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 22:10:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/182833; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eitan Adler To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, makc@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/182833: [porters-handbook]: document QMake usage, update Qt section Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 17:04:14 -0500 Patch fails to apply :( Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.xml |=================================================================== |--- en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.xml (revision 42890) |+++ en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.xml (working copy) -------------------------- Patching file en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.xml using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 6539. Hunk #2 failed at 6639. Hunk #3 failed at 6656. Hunk #4 failed at 6826. Hunk #5 succeeded at 6894 (offset -1 lines). 4 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.xml.rej Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/uses.xml |=================================================================== |--- en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/uses.xml (revision 42890) |+++ en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/uses.xml (working copy) -------------------------- Patching file en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/uses.xml using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 221 (offset 42 lines). done -- Eitan Adler