From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 15:32:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5574FF for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC040FCB for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hn3so242463wib.5 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 07:32:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=ptCaosX2ca0VBg8BG7RGwGUKjFOiSpWUp9GKjXlMmk8=; b=C8YwAPQwqhVLU1/DFKftVDdV2PTiFNJRwCm9aahh2w5StrGSqf8eBq8e4TAPDEsDNN Y3X+RUpngYwGbKdwZkbL9wVqprbMb2KEAHnqZYhLve2rMO2cX7RdvhBE9mp5VboF/WVI eiqMvLXVih4Xtf6xuVMw/V0Zvha8m5k23EH700eFikDXkzUJY66bEtekRwrPJnn7SMZW FSq9td0KELwdbmzrD2Ule/eKXr1tTEWNsaXWOjUXxNbBqyF7muF7ptz/paxn5WWdabph nT1Og1jV/HHfzXHGe9qw/IuRF//3hPgySXNymUgQzmwjpQPgEVn5DRiOTUNoMSuYS2U5 BRxQ== X-Received: by 10.194.85.234 with SMTP id k10mr141879550wjz.53.1358263971083; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 07:32:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.44.24] (abo-99-180-68.mtp.modulonet.fr. [85.68.180.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bd6sm3894126wib.10.2013.01.15.07.32.49 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 07:32:50 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: make release doesn't correctly include EXTLOCALDIR ? From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:32:50 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <40B04B98-5651-40DB-BD73-2C6E16DA6795@my.gd> References: To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkgZR7R7wg6g2KsRjdWBB63feLSDG9pKTxyme+aidXWcSnch+CsSfobeJIYMMAZ80CCYvk4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:32:58 -0000 On Jan 11, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Fleuriot Damien wrote: > Hello list, >=20 >=20 > I'm running 8.3-stable r245223 from a mere 2 days ago and am in the = process of building a custom release for our internal use as = preconfigured firewalls. >=20 > "make release" works pretty fine except for a few quirks here and = there. >=20 >=20 >=20 > First of all, I have set EXTLOCALDIR so that the release contains my = existing /usr/local/ , and thus the collection of installed ports. >=20 > The problem here is that while /release/usr/local/ is correctly = populated, the ISO images and ftp install directory have an empty = usr/local/ > Extracting the ISO's base.?? files doesn't yield the /usr/local/ = contents either. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > The second problem I encounter is with the kernel's build. > Apparently "make release" doesn't pull MODULES_OVERRIDE from = /etc/make.conf and decides to build every single module, as opposed to = my own restricted list. >=20 > I'm going to try with with KERNEL_FLAGS=3D-DMODULES_OVERRIDE module1 = module2 in /usr/src/release/Makefile >=20 >=20 >=20 > Has anyone else ever experienced the same problem regarding the = inclusion of /usr/local/ in their release ? >=20 Reposting to -stable in the hope of getting feedback, having received = none on -questions. Has anyone experienced this before ? Is this intended behaviour ? I fail to see the purpose of including /usr/local/ if it won't be = packaged into the release images.