From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 15:13:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F328354F for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF32147F for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.10.5] ([62.246.110.10]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MU0U9-1VhxJt0hiD-00QhXs for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:08:04 +0100 Message-ID: <52E91955.9030406@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:08:05 +0100 From: Michael Schmiedgen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Marakasov Subject: Re: [OT] ta-spring References: <20140129022743.GO52820@hades.panopticon> <7B2C5E6B-C845-4AFB-845F-AAF6F3C1F239@FreeBSD.org> <20140129144518.GR52820@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20140129144518.GR52820@hades.panopticon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zsaW+MViaNSSFOR8i4w5LhqAuPeaQ8xhp9FeCap8UB2TunMkd30 Xy4EpLEwF/qx5dIB2i5ayay5KoDXuT96M3AKCG0tAexa5dZrxpqKbBFnCdgDy0XqWVKIC3o 4Q9zBRULtUj2cTIX+Ia4Jps3S33UnCO4L30qO14loZ6UUSRtTJVc20IoG33un6fJFWpeAr6 y7ZD/4f3TdZRaFAxeRHrw== Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:13:23 -0000 On 29.01.2014 15:45, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Dimitry Andric (dim@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > >> >> Hm, which port is having problems with this? I have built quite a large >> set, and never encountered this issue. >> >> In any case: yes, it is quite long overdue for a libc++ update. :-) I >> will have a look tonight. > > New version of games/spring (not in ports yet). > Can we expect a current version of spring in ports soon? That would be nice! AFAIK newer versions require OpenMP. Will this compile with our (new 3.4 soon) base clang? Michael