Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 13:58:07 -0500 (EST) From: Pedro Giffuni <m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>, ache@nagual.ru, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Niklas Hallqvist: archivers/hpack.non-usa.only Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.970108134645.2680A-100000@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co> In-Reply-To: <E0vi2Wj-00031q-00@rover.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Warner Losh wrote: > > Letting the OpenBSD sort it out strikes me as a bad way to do this. > It sends the wrong message to the OpenBSD camp that they are not > important or worth consideration in the changes to the ports tree. > While this specific change may be better, framing the change in such > terms only exacerbates already tense relations between the two camps. > Just my view of the situation, not the opinion of any camps that I may > have my feet in... > OK, I agree. My solution was only thought of as a temporal fix, instead of having them define FreeBSD in their tree. I thought our relations were much better and they would like to colaborate for their own good; we have much to learn from their multiplatform environment. best regards, Pedro. > >Warner > Available for work Resume: http://www.village.org/villagers/imp/mwlres.html >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.91.970108134645.2680A-100000>