Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 06 Jan 2020 02:52:57 +0900 (JST)
From:      Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org>
To:        imp@bsdimp.com
Cc:        emaste@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r356379 - head/share/mk
Message-ID:  <20200106.025257.202876441661893679.yasu@utahime.org>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfqVFoY%2ByaTK4OXPPLfeYH8Xz%2B-mqQ0nhQrROn_g74pNMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <202001051659.005GxOOa013759@repo.freebsd.org> <CAPyFy2CvVQ8e8rRvHsB76qNz2_eL8c1EMpKP0z2vCbfWPn10hg@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfqVFoY%2ByaTK4OXPPLfeYH8Xz%2B-mqQ0nhQrROn_g74pNMQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r356379 - head/share/mk
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 11:26:07 -0600

>> > Author: emaste
>> > Date: Sun Jan  5 16:59:24 2020
>> > New Revision: 356379
>> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/356379
>> >
>> > Log:
>> >   src.opts.mk: disable BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP on mips64*
>>
>> I should probably make this the case for all of mips* and sparc64.
>> Using a decade-old binutils with a contemporary compiler (either Clang
>> or GCC) isn't likely to be a combination used by anyone else and it's
>> not going to be a good use of our time investigating and addressing
>> any issues that arise.
>>
> I'd agree. There are lots of bugs or missing features in our binutils that
> will bite people...

Just out of curiosity, is there any retirement plan for binutils in
base system at the moment?

---
Yasuhiro KIMURA



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200106.025257.202876441661893679.yasu>