From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sun Jun 10 19:43:06 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514C5101B0AD; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 19:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06F8F745EC; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 19:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.42.150] (unknown [127.0.1.132]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA912C09; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 19:43:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@FreeBSD.org) From: "Jonathan Anderson" To: "Antoine Brodin" Cc: "Eitan Adler" , "Robert N. M. Watson" , src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r334931 - in head: . sys/sys Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 17:10:32 -0230 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.11.2r5479) Message-ID: <3D29EC4B-D05D-4485-98BD-8E5EB5C1E8E9@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <201806101915.w5AJFcZM001907@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 19:43:06 -0000 On 10 Jun 2018, at 16:49, Antoine Brodin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Eitan Adler > wrote: >> Author: eadler >> Date: Sun Jun 10 19:15:38 2018 >> New Revision: 334931 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/334931 >> >> Log: >> Revert r334929 >> >> Apparently some software might depend on a header whose sole >> contents is >> a `#warning` to remove it. Revert pending exp-run. > > Hi, > > It's not just a #warning, there is a #include line below... > And after this change, most ports that supported sandboxing were no > longer sandboxed. This used the be the primary header file for Capsicum, but we switched to the somewhat-more-portable sys/capsicum.h awhile ago. The current sys/capability.h includes the new header while emitting a warning in order to encourage people to switch to capsicum.h without breaking anything (yet). This is a transitional step, and I think the plan is to remove sys/capability.h after... maybe the 12-STABLE branch? Jon -- Jonathan Anderson jonathan@FreeBSD.org