From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Oct 24 09:09:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA21110 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 09:09:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bang.rain.com (bang.rain.com [204.119.8.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA21105 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 09:09:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john@bang.rain.com) Received: (from john@localhost) by bang.rain.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id JAA17170; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 09:08:58 -0700 From: John Cavanaugh Message-Id: <199810241608.JAA17170@bang.rain.com> Subject: Re: another record To: dg@root.com Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 09:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199810240816.BAA00451@implode.root.com> from "David Greenman" at Oct 24, 98 01:16:46 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Well, yesterday's killer record of 587GB from wcarchive didn't last > long. It's getting a bit "interesting" that we're so close to topping the > terabyte/day threshold. Why "interesting"? We still have a ways to go before you saturate the 100Mb ethernet don't we? (don't skewer me if i'm wrong, I haven't done the math) And I know that the Pro/100B isn't the "sticky" point as far as pumping data out to the rest of the world... Can you give us some more details on wcarchives other upcoming upgrades? You had mentioned putting a 400Mhz Xeon in. Is this change going to a allow more ftp sessions or just get the load average under 30 occasionally? Thanks! ;-) -- John Cavanaugh "There can be only one." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message