From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 28 07:24:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C097637B401 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 07:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.attbi.com (rwcrmhc12.attbi.com [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B46443FEC for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 07:24:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[24.147.188.198]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20030628142430014009tklte>; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:24:30 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h5SEOQ1V052251; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:24:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h5SEOMeK052248; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:24:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: "Keith Pitcher" References: <000001c33c02$9b18c9c0$444daa41@diamond> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Jun 2003 10:24:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <000001c33c02$9b18c9c0$444daa41@diamond> Message-ID: <44n0g29t61.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.1 install - Slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:24:32 -0000 "Keith Pitcher" writes: > I'm doing a net install of 5.1 on an AMD K5 100, 16 megs ram. 2 gig HD, > put 128MB for swap. I know this is basically bare minimum, but it's only > going to be a modem gateway. > > I started this around 2am, it is now bogged down on adding the perl > package. So far it has about 5.5 megs downloaded and it's just creaping. > It's been on this same package for 8 hours and the install is just > creeping on up on the install size. I doubt this is net congestion and > blame it on the slow machine. > > My question is : should it take quite this long? I originally let it run > for 2 hours, thought it was locked up and restarted, see if it would > speed up. But this new install is slowing down at the same spot. It's probably swapping like mad. It would probably be a lot faster to do a more minimal install on that system, and download the package later as part of configuring the system.