From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Mar 29 16: 3:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778FF37B6EF for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:03:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA65611; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:03:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA17442; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:03:10 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200003300003.RAA17442@harmony.village.org> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Subject: Re: Call for review: new pccard.conf scheme Cc: Mitsuru IWASAKI , freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:14:40 +0900." <38E18330.64B77221@newsguy.com> References: <38E18330.64B77221@newsguy.com> <38E06BD8.346A53B0@newsguy.com> <200003281344.WAA14869@tasogare.imasy.or.jp> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:03:10 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <38E18330.64B77221@newsguy.com> "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: : Expect the best, plan for the worst. It is better to introduce the : version number keyword, and then find out it was too late than _not_ : introduce the keyword and find out it wasn't. No. Let's NOT complicate pccardd any more than we have to. It is going to die and the less we do to it, the more we can do to NEWCARD. Besides, if the worst does happen, then we can add a version flag later. If no version is present, it is by default version 1, just like now. I'm very strongly opposed to this. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message