From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Sep 16 22:22:34 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA09432
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 22:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA09409;
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 22:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5]) by mail.cdsnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA13761; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 22:22:27 -0700
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 22:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jaye Mathisen  <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: What bad things happen if I run 2.1 bins with 2.2-current kernel?
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.960916222124.27067G-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



Is this likely to work OK?  I realize programs like ps and stuff will need
rebuilding, but what about more "userland" type stuff?