From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 27 14:11:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7719D0F4C; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from che@bein.link) Received: from mail.bein.link (bein.link [37.252.124.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56861EF7; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from che@bein.link) Received: from thinkpad.localnet (home.bein.link [172.16.32.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bein.link (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36EA31AF1B1; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:11:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Maxim V Filimonov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Reply-To: che@bein.link Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No pkg-1.6 on FreeBSD 10.2? Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 17:11:32 +0300 Message-ID: <5241153.XFegVDgiRr@thinkpad> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150927080439.GW16800@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <3701506.t2rT67cocA@thinkpad> <20150927080439.GW16800@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:11:38 -0000 On Sunday 27 September 2015 10:04:40 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 05:21:49AM +0300, Maxim V Filimonov wrote: > > Hi, I'm using two versions of FreeBSD: 10.1 on my virtual server and 10.2 > > on my home machines. On 10.1, pkg has updated to 1.6, but not on 10.2. Is > > this the normal behavior? Is it going to update soon? > > Since 10.2 the releases now uses quarterly packages which are stable for 3 > month. > > pkg 1.6 will be part of the next quarterly which will appear at the > beginning of October. > > Best regards, > Bapt Thank you for your kind reply. Here's another question: does portsnap now fetch the ports from the quarterly branch? I just want my ports to be in sync with my packages. To use the quarterly branch, I might fetch the ports via svn explicitly. Same with the latest one. But what's the default behavior for portsnap now? Is it the same as it used to be? -- wbr, Maxim Filimonov