Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 17:11:32 +0300 From: Maxim V Filimonov <che@bein.link> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No pkg-1.6 on FreeBSD 10.2? Message-ID: <5241153.XFegVDgiRr@thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <20150927080439.GW16800@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <3701506.t2rT67cocA@thinkpad> <20150927080439.GW16800@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 27 September 2015 10:04:40 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 05:21:49AM +0300, Maxim V Filimonov wrote: > > Hi, I'm using two versions of FreeBSD: 10.1 on my virtual server and 10.2 > > on my home machines. On 10.1, pkg has updated to 1.6, but not on 10.2. Is > > this the normal behavior? Is it going to update soon? > > Since 10.2 the releases now uses quarterly packages which are stable for 3 > month. > > pkg 1.6 will be part of the next quarterly which will appear at the > beginning of October. > > Best regards, > Bapt Thank you for your kind reply. Here's another question: does portsnap now fetch the ports from the quarterly branch? I just want my ports to be in sync with my packages. To use the quarterly branch, I might fetch the ports via svn explicitly. Same with the latest one. But what's the default behavior for portsnap now? Is it the same as it used to be? -- wbr, Maxim Filimonov <che@bein.link>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5241153.XFegVDgiRr>