Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:46:48 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: Why so many tcl's and tk's Message-ID: <3F849396-95E7-4BED-9EA0-4860E3F7A52E@u.washington.edu> References: <45F72A58.5020106@math.missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Begin forwarded message: > From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> > Date: March 13, 2007 3:48:56 PM PDT > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Why so many tcl's and tk's > > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:09:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith >> wrote: >>> Are the different versions of tcl and tk really not backwards >>> compatible with earlier versions? >> No, they are not. > > What a pity. So how come the various linux distributions seem to > get away with only one version of tcl and tk? Better versioning in their package infrastructure? -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F849396-95E7-4BED-9EA0-4860E3F7A52E>