From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 10 09:18:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC0116A417 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:18:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbigniew@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF2C13C48A for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbigniew@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.szalbot.homedns.org [127.0.0.1]) by lists.lc-words.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7563E3F409; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:18:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from lists.lc-words.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (szalbot.homedns.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10026) with ESMTP id 91985-03; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:18:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.150] (unknown [192.168.11.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zbigniew@szalbot.homedns.org) by lists.lc-words.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638A73F407; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:18:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4735775B.2020105@szalbot.homedns.org> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:18:19 +0100 From: zbigniew szalbot User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" References: <473570FC.7070002@szalbot.homedns.org> <4735766A.2020806@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4735766A.2020806@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard Cc: zbigniew szalbot , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cups-base problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:18:47 -0000 Hello, Aryeh M. Friedman pisze: > > I am not sure I understand the message about remote execution of > > arbitrary code. > That is just saying that if the security issue is a problem for you > don't upgrade (i.e. go ahead if you don't care). > Thanks but I think I now understand even less :) If a security issue is a problem, don't upgrade??? Not sure also how one could go ahead? There is no option to continue. The message appears and that's all. I am not given any option. Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot