From owner-cvs-all Tue Feb 3 15:23:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA26316 for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 3 Feb 1998 15:23:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA26239; Tue, 3 Feb 1998 15:22:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA10417; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 10:11:49 +1100 Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 10:11:49 +1100 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199802032311.KAA10417@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: bde@FreeBSD.ORG, dg@root.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net raw_cb.h src/sys/netinet ip_fw.h src/sys/nfs nfsrvcache.h Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe cvs-all" >> Modified files: >> sys/net raw_cb.h >> sys/netinet ip_fw.h >> sys/nfs nfsrvcache.h >> Log: >> Added #include of so that this file is more "self"-sufficent. > > This seems like a step backward to me. I thought the idea was to gid rid >of nested includes? is one of the hardest to fix, so I'm treating it like an implementation-only include like . Applications certainly shouldn't have to know about it being a prerequisite, since it wasn't one until recently. I'm adding it to all headers that might be application headers (most might be :-(). Bruce