From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Aug 6 0:11:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF31B150B6 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 00:11:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id AAA73254; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908060710.AAA73254@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: Subject: Re: docs/10182: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=5038 Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/10182; it has been noted by GNATS. From: To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: wosch@FreeBSD.org, Tom Hukins Subject: Re: docs/10182: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=5038 Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 00:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Empirical methods of determining embedded URLs will always be, um, empirical :). In this particular case, a human could guess that the PR reference is a false hit. I'm not sure whether aiming for a 100% solution is (a) feasible or (b) worth the effort. Why not close this PR? Regards, Koshy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message