From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 18 01:01:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D8E3AD for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75971BA4 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [75.187.32.8] ([75.187.32.8:60096] helo=raspberrypi.bildanet.com) by cdptpa-oedge01 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 95/E8-05031-0EAC8055; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:46:25 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.53] (helo=GangGreene.bildanet.com) by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YY27s-0003UF-Ie for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:46:24 -0400 Message-ID: <5508CAE2.4060300@columbus.rr.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:46:26 -0400 From: Baho Utot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD recommends not using base unbound for an authoritative server References: <20150317192847.5b39d1c8@lapsdeb> In-Reply-To: <20150317192847.5b39d1c8@lapsdeb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:01:50 -0000 On 03/17/15 19:28, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:25:09 -0700 > Chris Stankevitz wrote: >> For the same reasons, I'd like to run the base system's unbound to >> authoritatively host my DNS... but FreeBSD is discouraging me in >> section 29.7.2 of the manual. Why the discouragement? > Unbound is only a validating caching resolver. It *can't* be > authoritative. I am using unbound as an authoritative DNS resolver for my home network, it also is the caching resolver. It runs on a raspberry pi under FreeBSD 11.