Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:03:30 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Weekly status update 17/01/04-23/01/04 (cvs-src summary) Message-ID: <20040124220330.GK908@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20040124070846.GA595@omoikane.mb.skyweb.ca> References: <20040124070846.GA595@omoikane.mb.skyweb.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 01:08:46AM -0600, Mark Johnston wrote: >- Subject matter - too narrow? too broad? should I cover the -current > list instead of cvs-src, or try to combine both into one report? It would be nice to see a -current summary but I think it should be a separate report and I'd be a bit concerned about burnout if you tried to do both yourself. I'd start by producing the cvs-src report only for a few months and see how things turn out. >- Prose - too technical? not technical enough? too flowery? too plain? Good - just right. > >- Commits covered - Did I miss anything I should have included, or > include things I should have skipped? I don't recall seeing any commits that should have been mentioned but weren't and didn't see anything in the report that I felt should have been left out. >- Impartial? I've tried not to attribute consensus and opinions where > they weren't very clear; have I succeeded? I think the report was impartial >- Interest - would you be interested in seeing something like this > produced weekly? Definitely. I think the report is an excellent idea. Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040124220330.GK908>