Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:04:58 -0700 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: doug@safeport.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unix permissions questions Message-ID: <B3697A31-7525-42D9-BAD7-93FCADF6F960@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20100914200116.23a34732.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1009141324020.26109@oceanpt.safeport.com> <20100914200116.23a34732.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT), doug@safeport.com wrote: >> I found several directories whose permissions where set to >> >> dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010 .procmail/ >> >> All were .procmail which is what we set for procmail logging and supporting >> recipes. In reading 'man ls' it seems (to me) this might result from losing the >> execute bit on the directory. Is this correct? Been BSDing since 1995 and have >> not seen this set of permissions. Thanks for any insights. > > After a short read of "man ls": [ ... ] > Result: User can execute SUID, group cannot execute, others cannot search > or execute; sticky bit is set. Except that this is a directory, not a file.... :-) A bit of experimentation suggests that "chmod 7500 .procmail" are the permissions involved, which are silly. No group permissions enabled means setgid is meaningless, and I don't see any value for using the sticky bit here, either. Try using 0500, 0700, or maybe 4500/4700 instead. Regards, -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B3697A31-7525-42D9-BAD7-93FCADF6F960>