From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jul 11 16:29:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480E7B9206D; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:29:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 090EF138B; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:29:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bMe4s-000CBo-S6; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:29:02 +0300 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:29:02 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Mark Felder Cc: Andrey Chernov , freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE Message-ID: <20160711162902.GO46309@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20160710133019.GD20831@zxy.spb.ru> <20160710150143.GK46309@zxy.spb.ru> <9ead7cd7-7d1b-2dd8-eea8-43f7766d92a9@freebsd.org> <20160711102906.GN46309@zxy.spb.ru> <1468253073.695754.662984777.1E8F9C28@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1468253073.695754.662984777.1E8F9C28@webmail.messagingengine.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:29:01 -0000 On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > I.e. GOST will be available in openssl. > > Under BSD-like license. > > Can be this engine import in base system and enabled at time 1.1.0? > > And can be GOST enabled now? > > > > I think the wrong question is being asked here. Instead we need to focus > on decoupling openssl from base so this can all be handled by ports. This is wrong direction with current policy. ports: unsupported by FreeBSD core and securite team, no guaranted to comaptible between options and applications. base: supported by FreeBSD core and securite team, covered by CI, checked for forward and backward API and ABI compatibility.