Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:23:29 -0600 From: LuKreme <kremels@kreme.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary? Message-ID: <A64AD6C3-F931-41FA-BAB6-CFBF88E6C3FC@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: <566f28fc-8c6b-0d43-8455-0524e1965896@punkt.de> References: <566f28fc-8c6b-0d43-8455-0524e1965896@punkt.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 10, 2019, at 10:01, Lars Liedtke <liedtke@punkt.de> wrote: >=20 > Why not just make building in IPv6 support the default, and introduce a > flag if someone really needs or wants to build without that support? Because it adds to the load of testing. If you really need it, build from so= urce. --=20 My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways t= o reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97% now.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A64AD6C3-F931-41FA-BAB6-CFBF88E6C3FC>