From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 20:50:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1A45BAE for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8F02E4A for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0OKojLh062338 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:50:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194515] Fatal Trap 12 Kernel with vimage Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:50:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RC2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rodrigc@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:50:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194515 --- Comment #19 from Craig Rodrigues --- (In reply to darius from comment #18) I'm OK with merging this to stable/10, but I would like to get some feedback from PF users on the state of things in CURRENT before merging. What is your experience with this patch? Herbert Skuhra has provided good feedback, but getting a few more people to try it and report would be great. Herbert found another bug in CURRENT: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195859 That is a bug in the bridge code, and not part of the VIMAGE + PF fixes. However, all this stuff is interrelated. It would be nice to get a fix in for PR 195859, so provide a consistent testing environment for VIMAGE in CURRENT. That will make it easier to backport patches to stable/10. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.