Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 10:35:12 +0100 From: Joe Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net> To: "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com> Cc: "'chris@calldei.com'" <chris@calldei.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What do people think of maybe using the sourceforge software? Message-ID: <20000509103512.C2198@pavilion.net> In-Reply-To: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D74A2@l04.research.kpn.com>; from K.J.Koster@kpn.com on Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:04:39AM %2B0100 References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D74A2@l04.research.kpn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:04:39AM +0100, Koster, K.J. wrote: > > > > It's my opinion that there's no need for more "polish." > > Currently what we have, CVS and the CVSWeb HTTP front-end, seem > > perfectly adequate to me. > > > Well, that depends if sourceforge has more intelligent bug query methods > than simple keyword searches. If you can only keyword search, the current PR > database might be just as good. If sourceforge will allow me to search in a > more intelligent way, it may be worth the effort. Can you define "more intelligent"? Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000509103512.C2198>