From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov  2 00:01:20 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6FECF16A4CF; Sun,  2 Nov 2003 00:01:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5A3AF43FDD; Sun,  2 Nov 2003 00:01:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA25592;
	Sun, 2 Nov 2003 19:01:16 +1100
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 19:01:14 +1100 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200311020349.hA23nWn1021681@repoman.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20031102190058.E7961@gamplex.bde.org>
References: <200311020349.hA23nWn1021681@repoman.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 08:01:20 -0000

On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:

> jeff        2003/11/01 19:49:32 PST
>
>   FreeBSD src repository
>
>   Modified files:
>     sys/kern             sched_ule.c
>   Log:
>    - Remove uses of PRIO_TOTAL and replace them with SCHED_PRI_NRESV
>    - SCHED_PRI_NRESV does not have the off by one error in PRIO_TOTAL so we
>      do not have to account for it in the few places that we use it.
>
>   Requested by:   bde

Thanks.

Bruce