From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 17 18:02:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4ED156; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olavgg@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (mail-lb0-f175.google.com [209.85.217.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BD19CB; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id o10so1887240lbi.20 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:02:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zhD3PfcKZ0mzzjc0BBw078I4sJzw58AplrCbs2Ag6Rw=; b=K4kcmPxC1EiNNGidFVq2ObBsZiMmHRKTTmCPtOrOvc2s86Z61aK28REdze3apRXNRq bfAAvTFntbPZ+NhOigjn/SN5f7eU0T+aO8fGiM1yY6Xu6azRRfckt3jhwo3+548DVmuB H6kfB1Whzxj6fllHgj9ojI6ttwfiNRppHf+p8MMdMQIo50szSuOUXvs8SocHf2ADhNb3 C1pFFrCr8HMXlQqhw5PNNWJVpWTjq3Jy/UwKkGYzGGISe6XSjZKjgbxAkk4ftx4rPUPp J+0EKrlCUYA9/MJ2IWrZXP6GD/G4R6C0eYW/QyzFAvbPKwViCErNdRpubnbCang6nAOk n0TA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.120.40 with SMTP id kz8mr4049092lab.32.1366221744595; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.23.232 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:02:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <13CE3D12-75A7-46A9-920A-F12753E8CF7A@andric.com> References: <201304161609.r3GG9SID009937@svn.freebsd.org> <20130417082956.GA98554@icarus.home.lan> <516EC2A0.6090102@FreeBSD.org> <13CE3D12-75A7-46A9-920A-F12753E8CF7A@andric.com> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:02:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: make buildkernel for GENERIC 9-STABLE just hangs, no error (was svn commit: r249549 - in stable/9/sys: amd64/conf i386/conf) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olav_Gr=F8n=E5s_Gjerde?= To: Dimitry Andric Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Jeremy Chadwick , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org, Pedro Giffuni X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:02:32 -0000 I have to admit that I didn't wait for an hour, as buildkernel usually complete within 30 minutes on my system. I just tried to build the kernel on another very similar system, no problems there. I forgot to mention that I tried to upgrade from an 8-STABLE from last summer directly to the latest 9-STABLE. Most likely its just something very wrong with my setup and a complete reinstallation would probably be a good idea. Thanks for your help. On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On Apr 17, 2013, at 17:41, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > On 04/17/13 03:29, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:09:28PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> Author: brooks > >>> Date: Tue Apr 16 16:09:27 2013 > >>> New Revision: 249549 > >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/249549 > >>> > >>> Log: > >>> MFC (much delayed) 234504: > >>> Enable DTrace hooks in GENERIC. > >>> > >>> Modified: > >>> stable/9/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC > >>> stable/9/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > >>> Directory Properties: > >>> stable/9/sys/ (props changed) > >>> > >>> ... > >> And here come the complaints, which warrant responses from key folks who > >> are in the know: > >> > >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-April/073132.html > >> > > > > It looks like 9 days ago there was a change (r249243) that fixed > > issues on the userland ctf utilities, so you have to update your > > userland too if it's not recent (make buildworld works fine). > > That was only a fix for certain DWARF attributes emitted by clang and/or > newer gcc's, which would cause ctfmerge to error out. > > If ctfmerge is hanging, that is almost certainly another problem. That > is, if it is really hanging, isn't it just very slow, maybe? What > happens if the original poster lets it run for e.g. an hour? > >