From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Jun 7 08:58:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA22550 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 08:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ohm.ingsala.unal.edu.co ([168.176.15.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA22543 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 08:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unalmodem.usc.unal.edu.co (unalmodem11.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.41]) by ohm.ingsala.unal.edu.co (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA03589; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 10:50:01 -0500 (COT) Message-ID: <33999E2E.719D@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Date: Sat, 07 Jun 1997 10:45:18 -0700 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: Universidad Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" CC: Michael Smith , stefan@exis.net, jdd@vbc.net, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Exchange vs. Notes References: <199706070723.AAA01292@MindBender.serv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote: > > Hey, believe it or not, I'm with you. Currently, FreeBSD and/or > NetBSD are about the best OS' available for ISPs. They have so many > advantages for that particular market. > Oh!!! M$ is being mercyful with the free UNIX community :). > On the other hand, the places where Exchange shines, are medium sized > companies to mega corporations, where commercial support is not only > preferred, but often required. > The mega corporations simply don't like risks: they use what everyone uses. If exchange and/or Notes is more popular is not a good way to determine which is (as you say) faster and better. At least I can run a Notes server from UNIX, no chance on ever seeing that on Exchange. BTW, I never suggest FreeBSD as a platform for a company: I know when I leave the building someone is planning to install NT on it. I only recommend UNIX-dependant platforms. If someone wants to ruin an SGI or a DEC witrh NT...well, that's their problem :-). > And don't believe MS is going to ignore the ISP market forever. On > the other hand, what they develop will most likely be significantly > cheaper than commercial Unix solutions, but will still not be free. > Boooo! :-) Pedro. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@MindBender.serv.net > --< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >-- > NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3, > Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32... > NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others... > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------