From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Aug  3 15:02:39 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA21018
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 3 Aug 1997 15:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kaori.communique.net (kaori.communique.net [204.27.67.55])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA21006
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 3 Aug 1997 15:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by kaori.communique.net with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3)
	id <P9Y8Z3J8>; Sun, 3 Aug 1997 17:01:58 -0500
Message-ID: <A03CD00C69B1D01195AB00A024ECEB16245D33@kaori.communique.net>
From: Raul Zighelboim <mango@staff.communique.net>
To: "'current@freebsd.org'" <current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Is 3.0 stable enough ?
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 17:01:57 -0500
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



Hello there!

	I am about to iunstall FreeBSD on a new INN NEWS server.  This
system will have 512 Megs of RAM.

	I am debating between usign 2.2.2-RELEASE anf 3.0-SNAP.

I would not mind beta testing 3.0 , but I do require some stability ;-).

Therefore, is 3.0 stable enough as to test it in a production
environment ?

thanks.