Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:17:32 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r349288 - head/archivers/ocaml-bz2 Message-ID: <533351FC.2020908@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <201403262018.s2QKId7b067131@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201403262018.s2QKId7b067131@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/26/2014 21:18, Antoine Brodin wrote: > Author: antoine > Date: Wed Mar 26 20:18:38 2014 > New Revision: 349288 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/349288 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r349288/ > > Log: > Stage support > > Modified: > head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile > > Modified: head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile > ============================================================================== > --- head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile Wed Mar 26 20:09:29 2014 (r349287) > +++ head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile Wed Mar 26 20:18:38 2014 (r349288) > @@ -12,10 +12,9 @@ DISTNAME= caml${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION} > MAINTAINER= jaapb@kerguelen.org > COMMENT= OCaml library to manipulate bz2 files > > +DESTDIRNAME= DONTUSEIT > GNU_CONFIGURE= yes > USES= gmake > -NO_STAGE= yes > - You left USE_OCAML_LDCONFIG= yes. Won't this create an ldconf file that will get added to plist and will conflict potentially with the real ldconf? USE_OCAML_WASH is also set. Is this knob actually desireable? Why is it needed if it's competing with pkg to remove files? I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just trying to learn this. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?533351FC.2020908>