From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 23 03:48:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4902A106566C; Mon, 23 May 2011 03:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5DD8FC12; Mon, 23 May 2011 03:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyj12 with SMTP id 12so6553462iyj.13 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 20:48:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qnRlcV9/jeLl8ManO2naUYxYOA/uznLzxM8HnTKAhz8=; b=VnP5GHBvLo5xwG8hBIBuzAFJV5MYY1mU/2qBgPANAwM7C7WrfovGKeq1hJDFkOBZsY xNALAL3nju3Pi8wa9rt3sZ5zk/3+sPRduRkH46MGNL//OELo+jBLpjgPk2OKA5VIaKP3 1NKFxtzOES34jRiEKvm0wVS6BRcgPQQ8SvB8Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qeRe6njn29bp0DsXyji9deNc+FDBMTYhAuV7CtQr7uRgwHSOXORH3U7chtcmSoQPAx FfIqfNhilGmo9siC0jzikFjDbMmC1vfB2KFyvSqEr7KplICnNFXLn88zgsnbWDQAt6XE FFfXltfRGzerPGVq4W1qCb5nJ+D+445R6hvug= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.47.72 with SMTP id ur8mr8717438icb.9.1306122487886; Sun, 22 May 2011 20:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.177.10 with HTTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 20:48:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5AF348C8-6AB6-490D-A12E-89A51528F58F@bsdimp.com> References: <4D934AF4.9080503@FreeBSD.org> <742085CD-7F6F-4879-9FFD-517EC3203D52@bsdimp.com> <5AF348C8-6AB6-490D-A12E-89A51528F58F@bsdimp.com> Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 23:48:07 -0400 Message-ID: From: Arnaud Lacombe To: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: mdf@freebsd.org, "Robert N. M. Watson" , Dimitry Andric , freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: Include file search path X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 03:48:09 -0000 Hi Warner, On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: > >> On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote: >> >>>> (2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. =A0This seems like a = basic >>>> =A0requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's not= yet a >>>> =A0resolved issue? >>> >>> 0 work has been done here to my knowledge. =A0The world view for clang = and our in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge. >> >> That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our build i= ntegration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in clang/LLVM? > > Yes. =A0The problem isn't hard, the cross compile paradigm is just a litt= le different. > >>>> We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new soft-core 64= -bit MIPS platform. =A0We're already using a non-base gcc for our boot load= er work, and plan to move to using clang/LLVM later in the year. =A0The bas= e system seems a bit short on detail when it comes to the above, currently. >>> >>> Yes. =A0I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close to bu= ilding with xdev compilers. =A0A similar number are needed to make it easy = to configure and add systree support, I think. >> >> Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just wor= ks" state with regard to this? > > I sure hope so. =A0I'd like to have demoable stuff by BSDcan. > BSDCan has passed, has there been any advance made since that discussion ? Thanks, - Arnaud