From owner-cvs-all  Fri Jul 12  4: 9:58 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C006A37B400; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 04:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1F99043E42; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 04:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org)
Received: from mousie.catspoiler.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2])
	by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6CB9hwr013769;
	Fri, 12 Jul 2002 04:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org)
Message-Id: <200207121109.g6CB9hwr013769@gw.catspoiler.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 04:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Don Lewis <dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet udp_usrreq.c
To: hsu@FreeBSD.org
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	jlemon@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <200207121107.g6CB7Cwr013757@gw.catspoiler.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On 12 Jul, Don Lewis wrote:

> I've been doing some digging through the code and it looks to me like
> both the INP_LOCK() and inp->inp_socket == NULL test can be eliminated.
> I think the INP_INFO_RUNLOCK provides sufficient protection.

s/RUNLOCK/RLOCK/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message