Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 16:25:46 +0200 From: Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Cc: chris@czv.com Subject: Re: Main site makeover Message-ID: <20050529162546.21d97df4@localhost> In-Reply-To: <c3ac406e38228864bfdf51f416da2d92@czv.com> References: <20050528165128.DEB8B1F50B1@ws1-2.us4.outblaze.com> <20050528225538.GD19079@gothmog.gr> <c3ac406e38228864bfdf51f416da2d92@czv.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature_Sun__29_May_2005_16_25_46_+0200_raeJNB_h+x+rF72F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Zumbrunn <chris@czv.com> wrote: > On May 29, 2005, at 12:55 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >=20 > > On 2005-05-28 11:51, Fafa Hafiz Krantz <fteg@london.com> wrote: > >>>> What happened to this? > >>>> http://www.monkey.org/freebsd/archive/freebsd-advocacy/200412/=20 > >>>> msg00080.html > >>>> > >>>> I don't know if these were generated from real HTML/CSS or just > >>>> created in a graphics editor. > >>> > >>> Actually, I've seen a front page that Chris did (I think) that's got > >>> the nice menu across the top and a really well designed front page. > >> > >> I just wanted to point out; > >> > >> There's *nothing* new about that design. > >> It still follows the old principles. > > > > It's ok. Small incremental changes are easier to test and accept than= =20 > > a > > full "throw it all away and use mine" style of update. > > > > The site now uses CSS a lot more than before, AFAIK. I'm not a web > > design guru, but if someone came up with a style that looks like, say, > > Wikipedia it would be interesting. > > > > Any takers who want to try revamping the front page by using *only* CSS > > style changes? >=20 > Yes, that was exactly the idea. There is a version committed in=20 > Perforce that took that approach and looks like this: >=20 > http://czv.com/zones/beastie/freebsd/freebsdweb1h.html > http://czv.com/zones/beastie/freebsd/freebsdweb2h.html Looks good. Was there already a discussion if the links should stay underlined or not? IMHO they should.=20 Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Signature_Sun__29_May_2005_16_25_46_+0200_raeJNB_h+x+rF72F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCmdD1bmGO+3DrZ9sRAhS4AJ0R3oIZW6uQ+MkTZ9ASozgbSvWt2QCfR7gW OYWpr8RRFpum/kZvrwkdvbo= =oBIH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Sun__29_May_2005_16_25_46_+0200_raeJNB_h+x+rF72F--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050529162546.21d97df4>