Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:03:48 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
To:        Jochen Neumeister <joneum@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r528268 - in branches/2020Q1/www: flashplayer linux-flashplayer
Message-ID:  <20200312070348.GA52752@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <491d1e11-5772-7bd1-3c00-8d97723b1ffa@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202003120306.02C36SSk038133@repo.freebsd.org> <491d1e11-5772-7bd1-3c00-8d97723b1ffa@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:20:49AM +0100, Jochen Neumeister wrote:
> Am 12.03.20 um 04:06 schrieb Jung-uk Kim:
> > New Revision: 528268
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/528268
> > 
> > Log:
> >    MFH:	r528267
> >    Update to 32.0.0.344.
> >    Approved by:	ports-secteam (blanket)
> 
> What exactly is the reason for MFH, and why then (blanket)?
> I can't tell from the commit log.

It's probably safe to assume that whenever version bumps in this piece
of sh^Wsoftware it's due to another dozen of secutity bugs discovered.

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200312070348.GA52752>