From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 13 05:32:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A5A1065671 for ; Tue, 13 May 2008 05:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@pldrouin.net) Received: from smtp.cyberfingers.net (smtp.cyberfingers.net [198.177.254.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F328FC18 for ; Tue, 13 May 2008 05:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@pldrouin.net) Received: from ldaemon.pldrouin.net (modemcable090.40-56-74.mc.videotron.ca [74.56.40.90]) by smtp.cyberfingers.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B8CAB6C1B for ; Tue, 13 May 2008 01:32:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <482927F3.20409@pldrouin.net> Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 01:32:35 -0400 From: Pierre-Luc Drouin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080503) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Status of ZFS in -stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 05:32:37 -0000 Hi, I would like to know if the memory allocation problem with zfs has been fixed in -stable? Is zfs considered to be more "stable" now? Thanks! Pierre-Luc Drouin