From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Feb 22 14:34:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A9823F88B for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:34:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48PrRv0C2cz4bjV for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:34:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EB80623F889; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB38B23F888 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48PrRt5V3Rz4bhn for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA7B524F4B for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01MEY2LS088711 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:34:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 01MEY2Ai088710 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:34:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 244296] math/openblas: Need to resolve conflicts with cblas and lapacke Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:34:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jwb@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:34:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244296 --- Comment #2 from Jason W. Bacon --- (In reply to Thierry Thomas from comment #1) I think that would be a good idea, though there will always be a need to al= low different BLAS/LAPACK implementations to coexist. For instance, plink2 (https://github.com/outpaddling/freebsd-ports-wip/tree/master/plink2) curre= ntly crashes when linked with openblas but works fine with netlib. Since BLAS is not a bottleneck for this program, there's no reason not to make it availab= le using netlib (which is slow) while we try to diagnose the issue with openbl= as. While the various implementations are meant to be fully compatible, the rea= lity is that there will always be bugs and minor differences. Allowing users to work around them by using another implementation for a while will keep them happy and productive with FreeBSD. I was planning to save this for a separate conversation, but since we're on= the subject of systemic solutions, I'm preparing to commit the work of T. Orgis= on an interchangeable BLAS interface for pkgsrc: https://wip.pkgsrc.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=3Dpkgsrc-wip.git;a=3Dblob;f=3Dm= k/blas.buildlink3.mk;h=3De09d41644b7d6e3eb183b03b8a40604ef632efe4;hb=3DHEAD This system allows the sysadmin to specify one or more preferred BLAS implementations in mk.conf (equiv to make.conf on FreeBSD) and also allows = the package maintainer to specify which implementations are acceptable in the package Makefile. After some extensive discussion, we ended up with a pretty elegant and flex= ible solution. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=