Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:26:43 -0300 From: Mauricio Westendorff Pegoraro <mwp@pucrs.br> To: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us> Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: SQUID question - Urgent! Message-ID: <3953ABE3.79D5F3FA@pucrs.br> References: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0006231241460.17745-100000@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Dillon wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Mauricio Westendorff Pegoraro wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Does anyone knows whats the following squid error means? > > > > 2000/06/23 14:20:23| comm_open: socket failure: (55) No buffer space > > available > > 2000/06/23 14:20:23| comm_open: socket failure: (55) No buffer space > > available > > 2000/06/23 14:20:24| comm_open: socket failure: (55) No buffer space > > available > > 2000/06/23 14:20:24| comm_open: socket failure: (55) No buffer space > > available > > 2000/06/23 14:20:24| comm_open: socket failure: (55) No buffer space > > available > > 2000/06/23 14:20:24| comm_open: socket failure: (55) No buffer space > > available > > 2000/06/23 14:20:25| comm_open: socket failure: (55) No buffer space > > available > > 2000/06/23 14:20:25| comm_open: socket failure: (55) No buffer space > > available > > 2000/06/23 14:20:25| comm_open: socket failure: (55) No buffer space > > available > > 2000/06/23 14:20:25| comm_open: socket failure: (55) No buffer space > > available > > > > I didn't found anything like this in Squid's site. > > My machine is 4.0 FreeBSD, running Squid 2.3. It's a 128MB memory > > Pentium III. > > I don't think this is actually Squid's problem. What does netstat -m > say when this is occurring? I've only ever seen this happen one time, > on my mail server using a 3COM 3C509 (Etherlink III), and when it did > no communication with anything was possible. The only way I could > solve the problem was to use ifconfig to bring the link down and then > back up. I'm not sure if it was really a network card or driver > problem, but bringing the link down and back up probably triggered > something in the kernel that set things straight. Running netstat -m I get the following: # netstat -m -I ep1 1247/1664/4096 mbufs in use (current/peak/max): 258 mbufs allocated to data 988 mbufs allocated to packet headers 1 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses 252/592/1024 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) 1392 Kbytes allocated to network (47% in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines I do have a 3COM 3C509 (Etherlink III, ISA) in one side of the gateway (it's a gateway machine) and a 3COM 3C90x on the other side. The first interface is connect to radio link via AUI. I tried to the interface down and then up but it didn't work. I am trying other things now. Don' you think that this has something to do with the SA-00:23 released yesterday? One more information: I am using squid as transparente proxy. Thanks for the help. MaurícioWP. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3953ABE3.79D5F3FA>