From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 05:00:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D611065675 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:00:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3AC8FC08 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwg14 with SMTP id 14so1193369wwg.31 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:00:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LkbnL1EZ0ObTkNdKgkoalz+o91ciHFpCNRFFgyqdzI8=; b=WeXpJyy/ZmVfry5VpUb5oiH5Syj+rDuqXie6b//VCKqtZn7bvJupYyjt+BM4Bd8AjN gfxQ674T5OBKRQWbOw8iJ7uvgOXJqPJ+Tu+Bsd8Sgyt2+PcRHn1wHAMvpqIDxf5ALyVI oZoJ11a/8Q4lV4bnjSS0oRfmfe3ypoSd/lU3E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.90.6 with SMTP id bs6mr6625829wib.63.1320901216130; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:00:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.95.229 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 21:00:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4E8F51D4.1060509@sentex.net> <4EA7E203.3020306@sepehrs.com> <4EA80818.3030504@sentex.net> <4EA80F88.4000400@hotplug.ru> <4EA82715.2000404@gmail.com> <4EA8FA40.7010504@hotplug.ru> <4EA91836.2040508@gmail.com> <4EA959EE.2070806@hotplug.ru> <4EAD116A.8090006@gmail.com> <4EAE58A2.9040803@gmail.com> <4EB96511.50701@gmail.com> <4EBA3F22.2060204@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 21:00:16 -0800 Message-ID: From: Jack Vogel To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: pyunyh@gmail.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Jason Wolfe , Emil Muratov , Hooman Fazaeli Subject: Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging on em 7.1.9/7.2.3 when MSIX enabled X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:00:25 -0000 Hmmm, that's an interesting point Adrian, I'll look at that more closely. Jack On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > There's no locking around the OACTIVE flag set/clear, right? > Is it possible that multiple TX threads are fiddling with OACTIVE and > then it's not being properly cleared and tx kicked? > > > Adrian >